Thromb Haemost 2014; 112(03): 566-572
DOI: 10.1160/TH13-10-0860
Wound Healing and Inflammation/Infection
Schattauer GmbH

Inflammation and peripheral venous disease

The San Diego Population Study
Mary Cushman
1   Department of Medicine and Pathology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
,
Peter W. Callas
2   Department of Biometry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
,
Matthew A. Allison
3   Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
,
Michael H. Criqui
3   Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
› Author Affiliations

Financial support:This study was supported by grants R01 HL083926 (Dr. Cushman) and R01 HL53487 (Dr. Criqui) from the United States National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 19 October 2013

Accepted after major revision: 28 March 2014

Publication Date:
02 December 2017 (online)

Preview

Summary

The inflammatory response to healing in venous thrombosis might cause vein damage and post-thrombotic syndrome. Inflammation may also be involved in venous insufficiency apart from deep-vein thrombosis. We studied the association of inflammation markers with venous insufficiency in a general population sample. We characterised 2,404 men and women in a general population cohort for peripheral venous disease and its severity using physical exam, symptom assessment, and venous ultrasound. Inflammation markers, C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, interleukin 1-beta (IL-1-beta), IL-8, IL-10, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), E-selectin, monocyte chemoattractant-1 (MCP-1) and vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) were compared in 352 case participants with peripheral venous disease and 352 controls with no venous abnormalities frequency matched to cases by age, sex and race. Associations were also evaluated including a subset of 108 cases of severe venous disease, as previously defined. Odds ratios (95% CI), for peripheral venous disease for biomarkers in the top quartile (adjusting for age, race, sex, body mass index and history of venous thrombosis) were 1.8 (1.1–3.0), 1.6 (1.0–2.5) and 1.5 (0.9–2.3) for CRP, fibrinogen and IL-10, respectively. Associations were larger considering cases of severe venous disease, with odds ratios for these three analytes of 2.6 (1.2–5.9), 3.1 (1.3–7.3) and 2.2 (1.1–4.4), and for IL-8: 2.4 (1.1–5.2). There was no association of IL-1-beta, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E-selectin, MCP-1 or VEGF with overall cases or severe venous disease. In conclusion, a subset of inflammation markers were associated with increased risk of peripheral venous disease, suggesting potential therapeutic targets for treatment.